Videofluoroscopy has a distinguished track record in
clinical research and practice. Its judicious use in chiropractic practice may be valuable
in detecting and characterizing spinal kinesiopathology associated with the vertebral
subluxation complex.
The first known fluoroscopic image was produced by Roentgen in 1895. Roentgen placed
his hand between an x-ray source and a fluorescent screen, and was astonished to see an
image of the bones of his hand on the screen. One year later fluoroscopic screens became
available, and the technique was employed for "real time" observation of human
structures.[1]
A videofluoroscopic system consists of an x-ray generator capable of operating at low
(1/4 to 5) milliamperage settings, an x-ray tube assembly, an image intensifier tube, a
television camera, a VCR, and a monitor. The heart of the system is the image intensifier
tube. This tube permits imaging at very low radiation levels. It is used instead of
intensifying screens and film as an image receptor.
Clinical applications
The role of videofluoroscopy in the evaluation of abnormalities of spinal motion has
been discussed in textbooks, medical journals, and chiropractic publications.
Observational and case cases have appeared in the literature comparing the diagnostic
yield of fluoroscopic studies vs. plain films. In addition, studies have been published
reporting abnormalities detected by fluoroscopy which could not be assessed using plain
films.
Schaff described cases where instability of the upper cervical spine was appreciated on
videofluoroscopic studies. It was observed that all cases of upper cervical instability
are not revealed by static flexion-extension studies. The role of videofluoroscopy in
assessing the upper cervical spine in Down's syndrome patients competing in Special
Olympics events was discussed.[2]
Wood and Wagner reviewed the use of radiographic methods for the analysis of cervical
sagittal motion. They reported that videofluoroscopic studies may reveal kinematic
irregularities not detectable by examining the extremes of range of motion alone.[3]
Wallace et al studied the reliability of certain methods of fluoroscopic measurements,
reporting that independent examiners could replicate the measurements reliably.[4]
Van Mameren et al used fluoroscopy to determine the variability of instantaneous
centers of rotation in the cervical spine. These investigators concluded that their
procedure "shows variability of such low extent that it seems feasible to use it to
diagnose abnormal mobility or in assessing therapy in the neck region."[5]
Bland states, "Clearly, cineradiography is the best method for the study of
biomechanics and dynamics of motion in the cervical spine...The determination of normal
motion, sites of greatest and least motion, contribution by joints, discs, ligaments,
tendons, and muscles to motion (and their limitations), and the biomechanics of normal
motion of the occiput-atlas-axis complex all have been studied very successfully through
cineradiography."[6]
According to Ochs, "Cineradiography, using film or videotape, is shown in a study
of 34 painful or injured necks to be a valuable diagnostic tool. It is useful in fracture
management, diagnosis of instability and demonstration of solid healing. A video tape
system featuring instant replay, clear image and low radiation exposure was found to be
ideal for routine use."[7]
Buonocare, Hartman, and Nelson examined the cervical spines of 107 patients using
cineradiography, including 57 who sustained flexion-extension injuries. They concluded,
"The ability to demonstrate localized abnormal motion in the cervical spine allows
one to predict soft-tissue injuries and the quality of spinal fusions, spinal stability,
and early subluxation of the cervical spine--conditions that may not be identified on
static roentgenograms nor at physical examination."[8]
Jones studied abnormalities of the upper cervical spine using cineradiography, and
concluded, "Cineradiography has been used to detect instability not ascertainable by
routine roentgenograms obtained in flexion and extension..."[9]
In a case study of abnormal atlanto-axial motion, Tasharski noted, "Interpretation
by means of standard static radiographs failed to disclose the nature of the functional
post-traumatic disorder. Cinefluorographic visualization of the articulation in motion
demonstrated abnormal mobility."[10]
Woesner and Mitts also concluded that fluoroscopic studies often revealed abnormalities
undetected on plain films. They stated, "There were, however, a significant number of
instances in which cineroentgenography demonstrated abnormal motion not detected on
conventional roentgenograms.[11]
Cineroentgenography is, therefore, a valuable adjunctive technique and its continued
utilization in the analysis of cervical spine motion is justified."
Numerous applications for spinal fluoroscopy have been reported in the medical
literature. These include recording the effects of cervical spine traction, evaluating
cervical spine laminectomies, examining athletes presenting with pain, to assist in
surgical planning, evaluating atlanto-axial rotatory fixation, examining the effects of
cervical collars, characterizing joint disorders in the cervical spine, studying
degenerative disease of the cervical spine, and determining the effects of
occipitalization and odontoid hypoplasia on spinal motion.[12-20]
In addition to the studies cited, applications for fluoroscopy in chiropractic have
been reported in chiropractic trade publications, indexed peer reviewed literature, and
presented at chiropractic symposia.
Gillet, Henderson and Dorman, and Howe used fluoroscopy to study cervical spine
kinetics.[21-24] Shippel and Robinson described a case where fluoroscopy and magnetic
resonance imaging were used to evaluate cervical spine instability.[25] Leung used
fluoroscopy to evaluate the cervical spine and concluded, "Cineradiography has been
found to be the method of examination that conveys most functional abnormalities. The
diagnostic value of cineradiography is substantiated...The effect of chiropractic
adjustment in removal of cervical fixations was proven with cineradiography."[26]
Chiropractors Foreman and Croft in their textbook, "Whiplash Injuries,"
state, "This motion study of the spine may be quite useful in detecting abnormal
biomechanics secondary to ligamentous damage that may be unappreciated with plain film
radiography... Cineradiography or fluorovideo radiography plays an important role in the
diagnosis of aberrant spinal biomechanics that may be secondary to chronic muscle
contracture, scar tissue formation, or ligamentous instability."[27]
Antos, Robinson, Keating and Jacobs presented the results of an interexaminer
reliability study of cinefluoroscopic detection of fixation in the mid-cervical spine. Two
examiners reviewed 50 videotapes of fluoroscopic examinations of the cervical spine. The
examiners achieved 84% agreement for the presence of fixation, 96% agreement for the
absence of fixation, and 93% total agreement. The Kappa value was .80 (p<.0001). Only
the C4/C5 level was examined. The authors concluded, "The current data indicate that
VF determination of fixation in the cervical spine is a reliable procedure."[28]
Other chiropractic authors have described applications for fluoroscopy.
Taylor and Skippings used the procedure to study paradoxical motion of the atlas in
flexion.[29] Betge described applications for fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of dysfunctions
of the cervical spine.[30] Masters, and Mertz both used fluoroscopy to evaluate spinal
motion.[31,32] Robinson, and Sweat have also published articles concerning chiropractic
applications for fluoroscopy.[33,34]
In addition to diagnostic studies, fluoroscopy has been used to study normal motion in
the spine.
Bronfort and Jochumsen used cineradiography to evaluate intermediate stages and
extremes of intervertebral motion in the lumbar spine.[35] Fielding, and Howe described
normal motion of the cervical spine based on cineradiographic examinations.[36,37]
Few technologies in chiropractic enjoy the literature support of videofluoroscopy.
Unfortunately, it is currently under-utilized. Doctors of chiropractic should consider
exploring the potential of this technology in the assessment of subluxation induced
pathomechanics.
References
1. Glasser O: "Dr. W.C. Roentgen." Springfield, IL, Charles C. Thomas, 1945.
2. Shaff AM: "Video fluoroscopy as a method of detecting occipitoatlantal
instability in Down's syndrome for Special Olympics." Chiropractic Sports Medicine
8(4):144, 1994.
3. Wood J, Wagner N: "A review of methods for radiographic analysis of cervical
sagittal motion." Chiropractic Technique 4(3):83, 1992.
4. Wallace H, Wagnon R, Pierce W: "Inter-examiner reliability using
videofluoroscope to measure cervical spine kinematics: a sagittal plane (lateral
view)." Proceedings of the International Conference on Spinal Manipulation May 1992,
pages 7-8.
5. Van Mameren H, Sanches H, Beursgens J, Drukker J: "Cervical spine motion in the
sagittal plane II." Spine 17(5):467, 1992.
6. Bland JH: "Disorders of the Cervical Spine." Philadelphia, PA, W.B.
Saunders Co. 1987. P. 144.
7. Ochs CW: "Radiographic examination of the cervical spine in motion." US
Navy Med 64:21, 1974.
8. Buonocare E, Hartman JT, Nelson CL: "Cineradiograms of cervical spine in
diagnosis of soft-tissue injuries." JAMA 198(1):143, 1966.
9. Jones MD: "Cineradiographic studies of abnormalities of high cervical
spine." AMA Arch Surg 94:206, 1967.
10. Tasharski CC: "Dynamic atlanto-axial aberration: a case study and
cinefluorographic approach to diagnosis." JMPT 4(2):65, 1981.
11. Woesner ME, Mitts MG: "The evaluation of cervical spine motion below C-2: a
comparison of cineroentgenographic methods." Am J Roent Rad Ther & Nuc Med
115(1):148, 1972.
12. Bard G, Jones MD: "Cineradiographic recording of traction of the cervical
spine." Arch Phys Med 45:403, 1964.
13. Bard G, Jones MD: "Cineradiographic analysis of laminectomy in cervical
spine." AMA Arch Surg 97:672, 1968.
14. Becker E Griffiths HJ: "Radiologic diagnosis of pain in the athlete."
Clin in Sports Med 6(4):699, 1987.
15. Brunton FJ, Wilkerson JA, Wise KS, Simonis RB: "Cine radiography in cervical
spondylosis as a means of determining the level for anterior fusion." J Bone and
Joint Surg 64-B(4):399, 1982.
16. Fielding JW, Hawkins RJ: "Atlanto-axial rotatory fixation." J Bone and
Joint Surg 59-A(1):37, 1977.
17. Jones MD: "Cineradiographic studies of collar immobilized cervical
spine." J Neurosurg 17:633, 1960.
18. Jones MD: "Cineradiographic studies of various joint diseases in the cervical
spine." Arthritis & Rheumatism 4:422, 1961.
19. Jones MD: "Cineradiographic studies of degenerative disease of the cervical
spine." J Canad Assoc Radiol 12:52, 1961.
20. Jones MD, Stone BS, Bard G: "Occipitalization of atlas with hypoplastic
odontoid process, a cineroentgenographic study." Calif Med 104:309, 1966.
21. Gillet H: "A cineradiographic study of the kinetic relationship between the
cervical vertebrae." Bull Eur Chiro Union 28(3):44, 1980.
22. Henderson DJ, Dormon TM: "Functional roentgenometric evaluation spine in the
saggital plane." JMPT 8(4):219, 1985.
23. Henderson DJ: "Kinetic roentgenographic analysis of the cervical spine in the
saggital plane: a preliminary study." Int Review of Chiro 35:2, 1981.
24. Howe JW: "Observations from cineroentgenological studies of the spinal
column." ACA J of Chiro 7(10):65, 1970.
25. Shippel AH, Robinson GK: "Radiological and magnetic resonance imaging of
cervical spine instability: A case report." JMPT 10(6):316, 1987.
26. Leung ST: "The value of cineradiographic motion studies in diagnosis of
dysfunctions of the cervical spine." Bull Eur Chiro Union 25(2):28, 1977.
27. Foreman SM, Croft AC: "Whiplash Injuries: The Cervical
Acceleration/Deceleration Syndrome." Baltimore, MD, Williams and Wilkins, 1988. P.
114, 133.
28. Antos J, Robinson GK, Keating JC, Jacobs GE: "Interexaminer reliability of
cinefluoroscopic detection of fixation in the mid-cervical spine." Proceedings of the
Scientific Symposium on Spinal Biomechanics, International Chiropractors Association,
1989. P. 41.
29. Taylor M, Skippings R: "Paradoxical motion of atlas in flexion: a fluoroscopic
study of chiropractic patients." Euro J Chiro 35:116, 1987.
30. Betge G: "The value of cineradiographic motion studies in the diagnosis of
dysfunction of the cervical spine." J Clin Chiro 2(6):40, 1979.
31. Masters B: "A cineradiographic study of the kinetic relationship between the
cervical vertebrae." Bull Eur Chiro Union 28(1):11, 1980.
32. Mertz JA: "Videofluoroscopy of the cervical and lumbar spine." ACA J
of Chiro 18(8):74, 1981.
33. Robinson GK: "Interpretation of videofluoroscopic joint motion studies in the
cervical spine C-2 to C-7." The Verdict February 1988.
34. Sweat RW: "C-Arm Cinefluorography." Today's Chiropractic 13(4):31,
1984.
35. Bronfort G, Jochumson OH: "The functional radiographic examination of patients
with low back pain." JMPT 7(2):89, 1984.
36. Fielding JW: "Normal and selected abnormal motion of cervical spine from
second cervical vertebra based on cineroentgenography." J Bone and Joint Surg
46-A:1779, 1964.
37. Howe JW: "Cineradiographic evaluation of normal and abnormal cervical spinal
function." J of Clinical Chiro 2:76, 1972.
(Dr. Christopher Kent, a 1973 graduate of Palmer College of Chiropractic, was named
chiropractic researcher of the year in 1991 by the ICA and in 1994 by the WCA. Dr. Kent is
director of research for EMG Consultants, Inc., and co-founder of Paradigm Partners, Inc.
With Dr. Patrick Gentempo, Jr., Dr. Kent produces a monthly audio tape journal, "On
Purpose," covering current events in science, philosophy, and politics of vital
interest to the practicing chiropractor. For subscription information call
1-800-892-6463.)