Much of the testimony presented by expert witnesses during the
now-famous Canadian inquest into the death of Lana Dale Lewis clearly
refutes neurologist accusations that chiropractic neck adjustments can
cause stroke.
Lewis, 45, received upper vertebral manipulation from Toronto
chiropractor, Philip Emanuele, on Aug, 2, 1996. Six days later, the woman
suffered a stroke and, on Sept. 12, she died. Initially, the coroner's
office did not feel that an inquest was warranted.
However, after a Saskatoon woman, Laurie Jean Mathiason, died following
a neck manipulation in 1998, Canadian neurologists began issuing warnings
that chiropractic treatments were linked to stroke. In January 2000,
Lewis' family -- convinced by this publicity that the stroke was caused by
the chiropractic treatment -- filed a $12 million civil lawsuit against
the Dr. Emanuele and several chiropractic organizations for "ignoring
their professional and civic responsibilities to widely disseminate the
facts and findings surrounding the death." The family also asked the
coroner's office to re-examine the case and call for an inquest.
Although two judges had already turned down requests for an inquest,
the chief coroner relented after the media, spurred by medical interests,
began focusing on the case. The inquest was to begin in April 2001 but was
delayed after the family's legal agent, Montreal pediatrician Murray Katz,
was removed from the case for sending a threatening letter to a coroner,
since retired, in the case.
Dr. Katz is well-known for his vehement opposition to chiropractic. In
1998, speaking at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Katz scoffed
at the concept of subluxations. "This is all a sham. There are no
bones out of place. Readjustment is a treatment in search of a
disease," he stated. Katz had also testified in the Mathiason case,
stating that radiologists might be liable if they provide X-rays to a
chiropractor.
About that same time, the coroner dismissed Dr. John Norris as a
witness for the state. Norris, a Toronto neurologist, was head of the
Canadian Stroke Consortium.
Although the Consortium describes itself as "an academic alliance
committed to the pursuit of anti-stroke therapies by designing and/or
conducting research projects and clinical trials," their client list
reads like a directory of pharmaceutical companies, including: Astra
Pharma, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dupont-Pharma, Eli Lilly & Co.,
Glaxo-Wellcome, Hoffman-La Roche, Novartis, Pharmaceutical Research
Associates, Pharmacia Upjohn, Pfizer, SmithKline Beecham, Warner Lambert (Parke
Davis Canada), and Wyeth-Ayerst Research.
It was also revealed that Norris had been in contact with Katz about
the case. The coroner's office stated that it wanted the inquest to focus
solely on Lewis' death, rather than become an indictment of chiropractic
in general. New evidence further delayed the inquest.
Finally, in April 2002, the inquest began with the testimony of Dr. Al-Noor
Dhanani, Lewis' treating neurologist.
Under intense interrogation by Tim Danson, counsel for the Canadian
Chiropractic Association and Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, and
Brian Foster, counsel for Dr. Emanuele, Dr. Dhanani admitted that Lewis
had numerous risk factors for stroke. She was overweight, had high blood
pressure, smoked, used alcohol, had elevated cholesterol, and a family
history of heart disease and hypertension.
The cross-examination of Dr. John Deck, one of the two
neuropathologists who wrote the original neurological autopsy report,
began on April 26.
Under Danson's questioning, Dr. Deck admitted that during his 31 years
of experience and more than 10,000 autopsies, he had never seen an
arterial dissection related to chiropractic manipulation. He said his
knowledge of a relationship between cervical manipulations and dissection
was based only on medical literature.
One of the most persuasive witnesses, however, was Dr. Michael Pollanen,
who worked as a consultant with the coroner's office under Deck's
supervision in 1996.
Although Dr. Pollanen had a doctorate in neuropathology, he had not yet
received his medical degree at the time he and Deck concluded that Lewis'
stroke was caused by the chiropractic treatment. In court, though, he
recanted that statement, saying that after examining 507 specimen slides
of tissue, bone and arteries he was convinced that the adjustment was not
related to the women's stroke or subsequent death.
"We were wrong," Pollanen stated during the inquest on May 7.
"In retrospect, our conclusions were erroneous." He told the
jury that he now felt a "reasonable degree of medical certainty"
that Ms. Lewis died of natural causes.
Also testifying during the inquest was Scott Haldeman, D.C., Ph.D.,
M.D., who serves on the faculty as clinical professor in the Department of
Neurology at the University of California- Irvine, and as adjunct
professor at Los Angeles Chiropractic College. He stated that Lewis' death
was definitely not caused the by chiropractic neck manipulation but from a
blockage in one of the arteries leading to her brain. He emphasized the
many lifestyle factors which made Lewis a prime candidate for stroke.
At press time, the inquest was continuing as both sides called expert
witnesses about the possible connection between chiropractic and stroke.