Terminology can be ambiguous
My name is Parker T. Zarbuck, D.C. a 1998 Life University, School of
Chiropractic graduate, and practice chiropractic with my father and
cousin. The practice is a subluxation-based exclusive Palmer Upper
Cervical Specific (H.T.O.).
I have enjoyed reading The Chiropractic Journal since 1999 and
have particularly appreciated the reporting on the many issues associated
with the lack of professional unity within chiropractic.
After reading the article "National to Publish Chiropractic
Medicine Journal," I share the concerns you mention. Specifically,
the collaboration with AACP and the failure of National University to even
mention vertebral subluxation on its website, articles or announcements.
I believe the situation we are in as a profession with certain
ambiguous and confusing terms is not only impeding further unity within
the chiropractic profession, but also impairing the consumers' ability to
understand the unique service that the chiropractor provides.
The phrase "Chiropractic Medicine" can be confusing to the
patient consumer. The word "Medicine" can mean "Healing
Art" and this is the sense that this word is used in many regulatory
statutes; hence "Chiropractic Medicine" is defined as
"Chiropractic Healing Art," an acceptable use.
The word "Medicine" can also mean that branch of the healing
arts which includes prescription of pharmaceutical drugs.
The word "Physician" is used in many regulatory statutes to
mean one engaged in the "practice of medicine" or "practice
of the healing arts."
Chiropractic diagnosis, analysis, practice, treatment and curative
procedures are drugless and non-surgical in principle and does not include
the use of prescription drugs or surgery which are prohibited by most, if
not all applicable law.
If a D.C. uses the phrase "Chiropractic Medicine" he or she
should clearly state this does not include the use of prescription drugs
and surgery.
It is my hope that you find this information interesting and helpful as
The Chiropractic Journal continues to present factual reporting to
the chiropractic profession. We need rectification of the ambiguous and
confusing terms which seem to be fueling divisions in this great
profession.
Thank you for your dedication in guarding and perpetuating the
principles of chiropractic.
Parker T. Zarbuck, D.C.
Urbana, Illinois