Treating simple lacerations of the hand conservatively instead of with
sutures is faster, less painful, and produces similar cosmetic and
functional outcomes, according to a study in British Medical Journal.
Researchers identified 91 patients who went to an emergency department
in California with simple lacerations of the hand that would normally be
treated with sutures. Patients received either sutures or conservative
treatment and were asked to return in 8-10 days for their stitches to be
removed or their wound to be assessed. Patients also rated the pain of
their treatment using a standard pain rating scale.
The mean time to resume normal activities was the same in both groups.
Patients treated conservatively reported less pain and treatment time was
14 minutes shorter. There was also no difference in cosmetic appearance
after three months.
The goal of wound care and closure is to have a resultant functional
and cosmetically acceptable scar, with low morbidity and high patient
satisfaction and comfort, say the authors. These goals can be achieved by
treating simple lacerations of the hand conservatively instead of with
sutures. The time saving has implications for health policy, they add.
Although these results cannot be generalized to cosmetically sensitive
areas such as the face, the authors conclude: "We were impressed with
how inconspicuous most scars were after three months and at the high level
of patients' satisfaction with the appearance of their wound."
SOURCE: "Suturing versus conservative management of
lacerations of the hand: randomised controlled trial," British
Medical Journal, August 10, 2002.