On June 21, 2002, the Commission on Colleges (COC) of the Southern
Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) notified Sherman College that
it had been granted accreditation to award the Doctor of Chiropractic
degree.
The news marked the culmination of more than three years of
self-evaluations, surveys, meetings, focused site visits, a 300-page
self-study and several progress reports to SACS. The COC/SACS accredited
the college for a five-year period, retroactive to January 1, 2002.
"Being accredited by SACS confirms what our alumni, faculty, staff
and students have known for a long time -- that Sherman College is a
well-run, high quality institution," said President Jerry L. Hardee,
Ed.D. "Having external, objective validation of that fact by a
regional accrediting agency further enhances our image and reputation in
the chiropractic profession and in the general academic community."
Sherman College is also accredited to award the doctor of chiropractic
degree by the Commission on Accreditation of the Council on Chiropractic
Education (COA/CCE), Scottsdale, Ariz. The CCE is a specialized agency
that only accredits chiropractic institutions and programs. SACS is a
regional accrediting agency that accredits other area institutions such as
Duke University, the University of South Carolina and Converse College.
Sherman College voluntarily sought accreditation with SACS because of
the benefits it provides for the college community, Sherman officials
stated. Sherman College holds Level V accreditation with SACS,
accreditation for institutions offering doctoral degrees or professional
disciplines.
Benefits of holding regional accreditation with SACS include enhancing
the college's placement in the non-chiropractic collegiate community,
facilitating stronger relationships with other SACS-accredited academic
institutions, opening opportunities for research collaboration and aiding
in the development of Three Plus One programs with area undergraduate
colleges.
"A major benefit of being accredited by SACS is that it allows us
to reach out and interact with non-chiropractic colleges and universities
in the region," said Senior Vice President for Institutional
Advancement Leroy G. Moore, D.C., who led the self-study process.
"This accreditation further legitimizes Sherman College's status in
the collegiate community," he said. Being accredited by the COC/SACS
also affirms the quality of Sherman College's academic program.
A further benefit of SACS accreditation is that it provides excellent
networking and educational opportunities for college staff, Moore said.
Staff members can now attend the annual SACS conferences, take advantage
of many networking opportunities and build relationships with their
counterparts at other SACS-accredited colleges. In addition, SACS
accreditation will allow Sherman College to interact with other colleges
in academic areas of study -- including research -- and will facilitate
library interaction with other schools accredited by the COC/SACS.
Being accredited by SACS also allows for greater ease and a more
seamless transition in developing Three Plus One programs with area
undergraduate colleges, said Susan Newlin, vice president for enrollment
services, planning and assessment. Three Plus One programs allow students
to complete three years of prerequisites at an undergraduate institution
and then transfer to Sherman College.
Following their first year of study at Sherman College, students who
participate in the Three Plus One program are awarded a bachelor's degree
in interdisciplinary studies, biology or a related field from the
undergraduate college. "These programs not only build relationships
with other colleges but help make chiropractic more available as an
attractive career to more undergraduate students," Newlin said.
In addition to all the "external" benefits of SACS
accreditation, members of the Sherman College community -- including
trustees, alumni, faculty, staff and students -- have personally
benefitted from the accreditation process. The 300-page self-study
conducted in preparation for accreditation engaged all members of the
college community in a thorough analysis and examination of every phase of
the college's operation.
The study was designed to identify strengths and weaknesses of the
institution, according to SACS Criteria, and to initiate procedures to
remedy any deficiencies. But the process also helped members of the
college community in their own self-improvement efforts. Moore says the
wide spectrum of campus participation in the self-study allowed college
constituents to better understand and appreciate Sherman College's
organizational structure. "By asking virtually all of the college's
faculty and staff and a number of students to serve on SACS self-study
committees, those people involved learned a great deal about aspects of
the college to which they may not normally be exposed," he says.
While completing the self-study was an extremely demanding and
intensive process, strong leadership and solid organization simplified the
process. The college's Administrative Council mandated the appointment of
a director, a steering committee chair, an editor and a steering committee
to organize and direct the self-study.
The steering committee then established principal committees to
accomplish the objectives of the self-study. Each principal committee
contained six or seven representatives from the faculty, alumni, staff and
students. Each principal committee critiqued a list of "must
statements," or college responsibilities, and then assessed whether
the college was in compliance with each of the assigned criteria,
documenting such compliance or making recommendations accordingly.
Principal committee members also designed and compiled surveys to
determine the college's effectiveness in areas for which documentation
alone was insufficient.
Steering committee members then built a "document library" -
a paper trail containing all bits of evidence that were quoted or referred
to in the self-study - in preparation for the SACS team visit last April.
During this thorough, three-day visit, representatives from other
SACS-accredited institutions reviewed Sherman College files in the
document library and interviewed college staff, faculty and students.
"Gaining regional accreditation with SACS was a college-wide
effort, and it was essential that all constituencies of the college be
involved in the self-study process," Moore said. "If we had only
allowed for administrative participation, we might have missed valuable
points in the self-study. Being part of a principal committee was a
massive task, but the people involved gained a great opportunity to learn
more about our college and its strengths."