December 2003
Louisiana Insurance Commission may fine Board for memo against CBS
A "bulletin" written
and distributed by Mark B. Kruse, D.C., President of the Louisiana Board of
Chiropractic Examiners, is being reviewed by the Office of the Commissioner
of Insurance and could result in a fine being levied for misrepresenting an
official statement.
The memo contained a
warning about Chiropractic Benefit Services (CBS) insurance policies and
suggested that "doctors ... may be placing themselves in a precarious
position" by choosing CBS. The bulletin item displayed a headline reading:
"LA Department of Insurance ‑‑ Medical Malpractice Insurance Info," giving
the deliberate impression that the information and the warning was issued by
the Department of Insurance.
However, it was quickly
ascertained that the headline was deceptive.
According to Paula P.
Davis, Deputy Commissioner with the Office of the Commissioner of Insurance,
"The Department of Insurance has not issued any statements, nor has the
Department rendered any opinions about, the CBS Medical Malpractice
Insurance policy."
Davis added that "The
Department's legal division is currently reviewing the statement to assess
if any fines are necessary," for the misleading memo, which was distributed
to licensed doctors throughout the state. She noted that Dr. Kruse told her
the heading of his statement was "written in error."
Dr. Kruse is the
American Chiropractic Association's Alternate Delegate for the State of
Louisiana and has certification in Chiropractic Sports Medicine, and from
the American Board of Chiropractic Orthopedists and the American Board of
Chiropractic Consultants.
"Most doctors are well
aware that the ACA has tried hard to discredit me and do as much damage as
they can to the World Chiropractic Alliance through me and my businesses,"
stated Terry A. Rondberg, D.C., president of the WCA and CEO of Chiropractic
Benefit Services. "I have come to expect personal attacks, but it is a grave
violation of professional ethics for a member of a state board to provide
false information to the doctor just to attack me. If Dr. Kruse's error was
a deliberate one, he should face more than a fine. He should be removed from
the board so that he cannot abuse his power by taking similar actions
against me or any other doctor of chiropractic."
The headline wasn't the
only incorrect information in the memo, Dr. Rondberg said. "The entire memo
was filled with such totally erroneous and misleading statements that it is
difficult to believe it was not a deliberate and malicious effort to malign
CBS," he added.
In a letter to
Louisiana doctors, he noted that, "Dr. Kruse made a personal statement that
amounted to rendering an insurance decision, even though he has no training
or expertise to do so. He did not speak with CBS officials to obtain
information on policy coverage, nor did he consult with insurance experts in
the state Insurance Department. The result was a statement containing gross
errors and misinterpretations."
Among the disputed
statements was one claiming that, in CBS, "a Class 1 chiropractor stipulates
that he/she neither renders diagnosis nor makes referrals to medical
practitioners."
This is not true,
explained Timothy Feuling, CBS President. "Class 1 chiropractors do
diagnose, although they choose to limit their services to the diagnosis of
vertebral subluxation complex. Louisiana state statute specifies that the
chiropractic scope of practice includes 'the diagnosing of conditions
associated with the functional integrity of the spine.' Vertebral
subluxation is such a condition and is within the scope of practice,"
Feuling stressed.
"Nothing in any federal
or state law mandates that a licensed health provider offer ALL services
allowed in a scope of practice statute," the CBS letter explained. "That is,
D.C.s and other providers are permitted to select which services they wish
to offer, as long as those services are within the scope of practice."
This concept of limited
scope is so important that some states expressly make a note of it.
California, for instance, lists the various services D.C.s are licensed to
provide, but states specifically that a duly licensed chiropractor "is not
required to use all of the diagnostic and treatment modalities set forth in
this section."
The same applies to all
health care providers. Dentists may be permitted by their scope of practice
law to perform extractions or root canal, but many choose not to do so in
their office. General medical practitioners may exclude pregnancy care and
childbirth services, even though permitted by law to offer those services.
CBS officials have also
contacted the Louisiana State Attorney General's office about the Krause
memo, and have asked for a ruling about limited scope of practice for
chiropractors.