In a stunning victory for Life University, and a stinging rebuke to
CCE's accreditation policies, the New Jersey State Board of Chiropractic
Examiners provisionally approved Life's chiropractic program.
In a unanimous vote, the Board accepted the recommendations of its site
team, which performed an exhaustive on-site review of the entire campus.
Led by Anthony DeMarco, D.C., a former president of the N.J. Board with
extensive experience evaluating chiropractic programs, the team also
included Lawrence O'Connor, D.C., Robert Apuzzio, D.C., and Kevin Earle,
Executive Director of the Board.
After spending two full days comprehensively reviewing all aspects of
the chiropractic program and talking with administrators, instructors and
students, the team was satisfied that Life University's chiropractic
program qualified for approval.
The report indicates that Life had implemented, or was in the process
of implementing, all criteria necessary for approval. The highly detailed
report addresses all aspects of the institution including its
organization, faculty, interviews with department chairs, plant, library,
medical museum, auxiliary equipment, clinical facilities, resources,
administration, records, requirements for admission, publications and
curriculum.
Although the report included recommendations for improvement, as well
as the recommendation that the team return in one year to ensure that all
recommendations have been implemented, the site team commended the
University for the significant and substantial improvements in its
program, curriculum, and governance since June 2002.
In presenting their findings to the full Board, team members stated
that they were enthusiastically received by Life's administration, and
were afforded full cooperation and total access to all areas of the campus
as well as access to all documents.
In commenting on CCE's refusal to reconsider Life's accreditation for
two years, Dr. DeMarco stated, "Not having been at the CCE inspection
in April, I can only speak to what we saw when went down there, and what
we saw when we went down there was certainly an adequate institution that
more than meets the particular standards of this state. We believe they
are educating and graduating good chiropractors that are safe for the
consumers of New Jersey."
DeMarco added, "I do believe, as far as CCE goes, not looking at
them (Life) now after changes have been made is probably doing a
disservice to the college."
Joseph Lauro, D.C., one of the State Board Members also questioned the
purpose of CCE's appeal process if changes made during that time period
would not be considered in their final decision.
While this decision to allow Life graduates to qualify for N.J.
licensure is certain to lift the spirits of many Life students, it is also
likely to put further pressure on the CCE.
The CCE has thus far steadfastly refused to reconsider its decision
that the institution must wait two years before it can regain its
accreditation. As a result, there is a large and growing segment of the
profession that views CCE's refusal to reevaluate Life's chiropractic
program as a political ploy primarily designed to contain and eliminate
traditional chiropractic programs.
This perception is strongly supported by CCE's decision earlier this
year to restructure its corporation and reduce the number of votes that
both Palmer and Cleveland Colleges receive on CCE's Council. It is
anticipated that N.J.'s decision will now prompt other states to question
CCE's motives and possibly send their own site teams to Life for
evaluation.
(Additional information on this and related issues can be found at the Doctors
for Excellent in Education website, www.dece.org.)