Crystalline substances, when subjected to mechanical stress, produce an
electric current. This phenomenon is known as the piezoelectric effect.
Closely related is biorheology, the study of the deformation and flow of
matter in living systems. The potential clinical implications of
biorheology and the piezoelectric effect challenge the imagination.
Basset [1] described the generation of electrical potentials by bone
responses to mechanical stress. In a later paper, Basset [2] wrote:
"Mechanical energy expended in [these] structures can produce
electric potentials of sufficient magnitude to exert a wide range of
effects in living systems. These include, theoretically, control of cell
nutrition, local pH, control and enzyme activation or suppression,
orientation of intra- and extra-cellular macromolecules, migratory and
proliferative activity of cells, synthetic capability and specialized
function of cells, contractility and permeability of cell membranes and
energy transfer."
Shamos and Levine [3] expressed a broader concept in their paper,
"Piezoelectricity as a fundamental property of biological
tissues." Since the publication of these pivotal works, other
investigators have expanded our understanding of these mechanisms.
Fukada [4] observed that piezoelectricity is demonstrated in a variety
of biological materials, including polysaccharides, proteins, and DNA. On
a cellular level, piezoelectric activity is related to microscopic
internal strain. It was also reported, "Stress-induced potential in
bone is produced by shear piezoelectricity in collagen fibers and
streaming potential in canaliculae. The growth of bone is regulated to
best resist external force."
Blum [5], a chiropractor, published a paper addressing non-synaptic
messaging associated with the piezoelectric/mechanoelectric effect and
relationships between low-level electromagnetic fields and neuromelanin.
Blum wrote: "The glial cells which surround the neurons and nerve
fibers could be generating an electric field at low levels. This could
then allow for communication within the body that would not have to pass
directly within the nerve tissue or solely at synaptic junctions. Vertebra
under stress might be exhibiting piezoelectric activity, which might also
affect these bioelectrodynamics."
Chiropractors Pettibon and Loomis [6] related piezoelectricity to
chiropractic. This paper discussed how alterations in spinal curves could
lead to changes in the piezoelectric activity of vertebra. It has been
conjectured that such changes may alter nerve function.
Lipinski [7] discussed the possible clinical implications of
piezoelectricity on a biochemical level, noting that movements brought
about by osteopathic manipulation and other movements may affect
biological macromolecules such as proteins, nucleic acids, and
mucopolysaccharides. Lipinski wrote that structural elements in the human
body are capable of transducing mechanical energy into an electric
current.
"Tensegrity" is a modern concept similar to D.D. Palmer's
concept of "tone." Tensegrity is maintained in "a system
that stabilizes itself mechanically because of the way tensional and
compressive forces are distributed and balanced within the structure. In
cells, tensegrity is maintained by contractile microfilaments, which form
a lattice that may reorganize locally into different forms." [8]
Ingber [8] wrote: "Remarkably, tensegrity may even explain how all
phenomena are so perfectly coordinated in a living creature ... tensegrity
structures function as coupled harmonic oscillators. DNA, nuclei,
cytoskeletal filaments, membrane ion channels and entire living cells and
tissues exhibit characteristic resonant frequencies of vibration. Very
simply, transmission of tension through a tensegrity array means to
distribute forces to all interconnected elements and, at the same time, to
couple or 'tune' the whole system mechanically as one."
Chiropractic adjustments likely influence tensegrity on molecular,
cellular, tissue, organ, system, and organism levels. The concepts of
tone, rheology, tensegrity, and resonance, as related to chiropractic
practice, deserve further exploration.
References
1. Basset CA, Becker R: "Generation of electrical potentials by
bone in response to mechanical stress." Science
1962;137:1063-.
2. Basset CA: "Review: biologic significance of
piezoelectricity." Calc Tiss Res 1968;1:252-. Quoted in Blum
[5]
3. Shamos M, Lavine L: "Piezoelectricity as a fundamental property
of biological tissues." Nature (London) 1967;216:267-.
4. Fukada E: "Electrical phenomena in biorheology." Biorheology
1982;19(1/2):15-.
5. Blum CL: "The effects of movement, stress, and mechanoelectric
activities within the cranial matrix." Int J Orthodontics
1987;25(1-2):6-.
6. Pettibon B, Loomis W: "Biomechanical research by Pettibon and
associates. The piezoelectric effect of the spine under stress." Today's
Chiropractic 1073 2(2):12-.
7. Lipinski B: "Biological significance of piezoelectricity in
relation to acupuncture, Hatha yoga, osteopathic medicine and action of
air ions." Medical Hypotheses 1977;3(1):9-.
8. Ingber DE: "The architecture of life." Scientific
American 1998;278(1):48-.
(Dr. Christopher Kent, president of the Council on Chiropractic
Practice, is a 1973 graduate of Palmer College of Chiropractic. The WCA's
"Chiropractic Researcher of the Year" in 1994, and recipient of
that honor from the ICA in 1991, he was also named ICA "Chiropractor
of the Year" in 1998. He is director of research and a co-founder of
Chiropractic Leadership Alliance. With Dr. Patrick Gentempo, Jr., Dr. Kent
produces a monthly audio series, "On Purpose," covering current
events in science, politics and philosophy of vital interest to the
practicing chiropractor. For subscription information call 800/892-6463.)