Read and respected by more doctors of chiropractic than any other professional publication in the world.

sp.gif (817 bytes)

The Chiropractic Journal

A publication of the World Chiropractic Alliance

 

Home
This Issue
Archives
Search
Advertising

January 2003  

see also: Wal-Mart's assault on chiropractic by Dr. Jeffrey Shay

WCA fights Wal-Mart decision on chiropractic

At a time when companies should be taking steps to reduce health care costs, Wal-Mart made the potentially costly decision to deny chiropractic care to employees through its company health plan.

The World Chiropractic Alliance (WCA) immediately contacted Wal-Mart CEO, H. Lee Scott President, at the company's Bentonville , Arkansas office.

In its letter, it pointed out the numerous studies that have shown that chiropractic not only can be more effective than medical treatment but can reduce health care costs.

One of the studies cited, published in the American Journal of Managed Care, March 1996, noted that "properly managed chiropractic care can yield outcomes in terms of surgical requirements and patient satisfaction, that are equal to those of non‑chiropractic care at a substantially lower cost per patient."

Another was the 1993 Canadian study, funded by the government of Ontario , which concluded that chiropractic care for those with low‑back pain was superior to medicine in terms of safety, science and cost‑effectiveness.

"In addition, chiropractic care can increase worker productivity by reducing recovery time," the WCA informed the executive. "In Victoria , Australia , a one‑year study of all workplace injuries involving back pain compared chiropractic and medical care and concluded that patients receiving chiropractic care required fewer compensation days to recover."

The WCA went on to cite other studies, and offered to provide additional research proving that chiropractic was of great benefit to patients and could reduce health care costs and employee down time.

"Given these facts, it's clear that an elimination of chiropractic coverage is an ill‑advised decision, one that will help neither Wal‑Mart Stores nor its workforce," the WCA letter argued.

In addition, WCA Director of Insurance Relations, Jeffrey Shay, D.C., contacted the company with his own persuasive arguments (see Dr. Shay's comments following).

"We will continue to fight against this decision," stressed WCA President Terry A. Rondberg, D.C. "and to convince Wal-Mart that its own best interests would be served by re-instating the chiropractic benefit."

 

 

© Copyright The Chiropractic Journal