November 2003
National insurance fraud seminar focuses on chiropractic
by Daniel J. Osborne, M.S.
In mid‑September 2003,
I attended the International Association of Special Investigative Units (IASIU)
18th Annual Seminar on Insurance Fraud in Orlando,
Florida, purportedly planned to
provide the best education available on insurance fraud, where more than 30
topics are being offered, taught by professionals from public and private
sectors.
The seminar opened with
an announcement by the IASIU president that the seminars focus would not be
on property related claims issues, as was the case in the proceeding
seventeen gatherings, but would be on health care fraud.
This re‑focus was
brought on by a paradigm shift within the insurance industry that the
biggest loss as the result of fraud is not from property (arson, theft,
etc.) claims but is from fraudulent health care claims. Complete information
on IASIU and their 2003 seminar can be found on its web‑site at
www.iasiu.com.
In actuality, the
seminar focused little on the overall problem of health care fraud in
liability claims but was clearly focused on the activities of chiropractors,
with a primary emphasis on multidisciplinary practices and mobile
electro‑diagnostic testing labs.
After the seminar, one
could have left with the belief that health care fraud and chiropractic were
synonymous, as the speakers continually attacked chiropractors with no care
taken to inform their audience that not all chiropractors engage in
fraudulent activity.
It was quite apparent
that the speakers were in an US (insurers) against THEM (chiropractors)
attitude! Clearly, the chiropractic profession was not presented as a viable
part of the solution in combating fraud and a member of the health care
fraud fighting team ‑ but appeared to be the target of it!
In one presentation,
after the speaker failed to mention the chiropractic examining boards role
as a source for investigators to report suspected chiropractic fraud, I
informed him of this oversight and requested he inform his audience of the
chiropractic boards involvement in combating fraud. My request went
unanswered.
In another
presentation, a speaker from Washington State did mention the chiropractic
board as a potential source for reporting suspected fraud involving
chiropractors, but added that it did not do any good until now ‑ "because we
have beat them up."
It was ironic to listen
to the silence and comments of these speakers from the hotel located just
across the street from the one the Federation of Chiropractic Licensing
Boards (FCLB) had held their annual conference just months earlier which
included discussions on health care fraud/abuse trends and efforts to combat
the fraud!
The truly amazing
aspect of the entire seminar was the unqualified and inaccurate information
presented by the speakers:
*** An attorney
defining what is a "worthless" diagnostic test.
*** No billing code
available for Current Perception Threshold test.
*** CPT defines proper
billing for technical components of services/procedures rendered.
*** HCPCS codes are for
hospitals and that chiropractors can't use them.
*** Chiropractors can't
perform 99205 level exams under any circumstance.
*** All mobile
diagnostic tests performed do not give good raw data.
*** Improper coding to
report a CPT code and indicate service provided for all diagnoses reported
*** Consultation codes
can only be used if referral from other discipline.
*** ACA rules preclude
a chiropractor from doing a CMT and E&M service on the same day.
*** Identifying as a
red flag for fraud the use of any CPT code ending in 99.
*** If a chiropractor
uses a CPT code ending in 99 he/she must send a letter to the insurance
company to explain why out of all the codes available they used a code
ending in 99, as well as a letter to the AMA telling them that they used the
code.
My purpose in attending
this seminar, which was well attended by over 1000 SIU representatives of
insurance companies throughout the United States, was to learn of new fraud
trends in health care, methods to identify the fraudulent activity, and
current efforts to combat the fraud to educate myself so that I could better
consult current and future clients.
However, after
attending the seminar I found no substantive information to meet my goals,
and left with surprise that the property & casualty insurance industry did
not appear, based on the presentations, any more sophisticated on
investigating health care fraud then they were some seven years ago when I
left their investigative ranks.
The attitude of the
presenters at this conference, and the vast majority of the attendees,
clearly demonstrates the insurance bias toward chiropractic.
How should the
profession deal with these misperceptions? I would urge chiropractic leaders
to attend these programs and build relationships with association officers
and presenters. When your presence and active participation in an
organization is known, attitudes change. This battle is winnable only if we
are actively involved on the battlefield!
(Daniel Osborne is
an expert on health‑care fraud/abuse and compliance. He works with health
care providers to increase practice certainty through educational programs,
working groups, practice audits, compliance programs, and general consulting
services. For further information on this topic, or other compliance
matters, contact him directly at 913‑369‑9000.)