September 2003
The neural hologram
by Dr. Christopher Kent
The cover of the
August, 2003 issue of Scientific American asks, "Are you a hologram?"
The opening paragraph of the article inside relates a contemporary version
of the triune of life in chiropractic: "Ask anybody what the physical world
is made of, and you are likely to be told 'matter and energy.' Yet, if we
have learned anything from engineering, biology and physics, information is
just as crucial an ingredient." Matter, energy, and information are
analogous to Stephenson's matter, force, and intelligence. The scientific
community, applying the findings of current research, is developing
constructs remarkably similar to those of traditional chiropractic
philosophy.
Implicit in
chiropractic is a philosophy of vitalism. Yet, many chiropractors have been
challenged by the theoretical constructs of the Palmers and Stephenson.
Bound by the lexicon of the times in an era preceding the quantum revolution
in theoretical physics, these pioneers sought to describe concepts that
challenged the mechanistic world view of the allopaths.
D.D. Palmer used the
term "mental impulse" in his 1910 text. D.D. Palmer wrote, "Chiropractors do
not treat diseases, they adjust the wrong which creates disease; they have
discovered the simple fact that the human body is a sensitive piece of
machinery, run throughout all its parts by mental impulse."
According to
Stephenson, "We might conceive of this mental impulse as being composed of
certain kinds of physical energies, in proper proportions, which will
balance other such forces in the Tissue Cell; as electricity, valency,
magnetism, cohesion, etc., etc.. Perhaps some of these energies are not
known to us in physics. What right have we to assume that we have found them
all? The writer presents this as a hypothesis or theory in order to get a
working basis... It is no discredit to Chiropractic that it must also use
theories concerning the transmission of mental forces."
Furthermore, Stephenson
noted, "The mental impulse is not an energy at all. It is a message. A
message is not a material, an energy, or a thing physical in any sense...
Mentality makes it and sends it to an object of matter."
The Palmers and
Stephenson developed their ideas in a world that relied on classical
Newtonian models of physics. Principles of quantum physics had not yet been
articulated or experimentally verified.
Predictably,
neurophysiology adopted mechanistic models, which reduced the function of
the central and peripheral nervous systems to a series of electrochemical
processes where receptors conveyed information to be processed by lower
centers, and stored in file folders in the cortex. Biologists acknowledged
that the mind had its biological base in the brain, yet a dualism persisted
separating body from mind and spirit. Uncomfortable paradoxes that
challenged the model were often dismissed or ignored.
Quantum physics and the
technology it has spawned are changing the theoretical base of
neurophysiology. And, as was the case in quantum physics, experimental
evidence is effectively challenging old notions.
Karl Pribram, one of
the most influential scholars today in the field of mind‑body relationships,
is well known for his work in developing the holographic theory of brain
function.
Just as early
chiropractors acknowledged that the mental impulse was a message, Pribram
characterizes the mind as a process rather than a thing.
Holographic (also known
as holonomic) brain theory was developed from the insights of Nobel Laureate
Dennis Gabor, who invented optical holography.
Consider how an
ordinary photograph differs from a hologram. A photograph stores light or
dark dots (analog information) at specific sites on a piece of paper. Cut a
photograph in half, and you will have only the information contained in that
half. If you keep cutting, each piece yields less and less information.
Not so a hologram. A
hologram contains information on both amplitude and phase. This means that a
hologram encodes the height of waves and how quickly waves move from one
place to the other. Put simply, a hologram is a recording of spatial and
temporal relationships. And if you cut a hologram into pieces, each piece
regenerates the image of the entire scene, not just a portion of it.
The reason for this is
that the hologram depends on ratios, not absolute values. Like angles, the
code is relational, and recorded throughout the hologram. The more pieces
you have, the brighter and sharper the image. Yet, any piece can regenerate
the whole image.
According to
holographic brain theory, information is recorded holographically. The brain
therefore is relational, and continuously engaged in correlational
processes.
Specific anatomical
sites that have been demonstrated experimentally (such as Brodmann's areas)
are not file folders, but the biological machinery needed to bring the
relational processes into the physical world of space and time.
The clinical
implications in chiropractic are profound. In addition to providing a
theoretical framework for the "mental impulse," the holographic theory may
provide the framework to help address challenging clinical questions: Why
can different techniques work equally well? How does the intent of the
chiropractor affect the adjustment? What is the physical effect of the
doctor‑patient relationship?
The challenge to the
chiropractor is liberating the mind of old ideas and models, and moving
forward. As D.D. Palmer wrote: "A mental impulse is an incitement of the
mind by Innate or spirit, in the form of an abrupt and vivid suggestion,
prompting some unpremeditated action or leading to unforeseen knowledge or
insight."
References
1. Berkenstein, JD:
Information on the holographic universe. Scientific American
2003;289(2):58‑65.
2. Palmer DD: "Textbook
of the Science, Art and Philosophy of Chiropractic." Portland,
OR. Portland Printing House Company,
1910. Pages 85 and 109.
3. Stephenson RW:
"Chiropractic Textbook." Davenport,
IA. The Palmer School of
Chiropractic, 1948 edition. Pages 268, 269, 292 and 294.
4. Prideaux J:
"Comparison between Karl Pribram's holographic brain theory and more
conventional models of neuronal computation." Virginia Commonwealth
University. http://www.acsa2000.net/bcngroup/jponkp
5. "Thinking Allowed"
(PBS interview with Karl Pribram and Jeffrey Mishlove). http://www.intuition.org/txt/pribram.htm
6. Pietsch P: "Hologramic
mind." Indiana University. http://www.indiana.edu/~pietsch/hologramic.html
7. Pribram PH: "Holonomic
brain theory and motor gestalts: recent experimental results." http://www.enabling.org/ia/gestalt/gerhards/prib.html