February 2004
CCP releases revised guidelines
New edition addresses maternity care, peer review, numerous other issues
The Council on
Chiropractic Practice (CCP) has completed its review and revision of the
"Clinical Guideline Number 1: Vertebral Subluxation in Chiropractic
Practice," first published in 1998.
The revision process
took nearly two years and involved more than 250 chiropractors, scientists,
researchers, technique experts, lay people and others around the world. The
revised guidelines include new recommendations dealing with maternity care,
peer review, open adjusting rooms, heart rate variability, radiographic
digitizing, record keeping, and patient privacy. In addition, commentary was
added to many of the previous recommendations to bring them up to date with
the current literature.
"We completed an
exhaustive review of the literature since the last review and also included
a thorough review of the guideline development literature that was published
since the first publication of the Guidelines in 1998," stated CCP President
Christopher Kent, D.C. "This is a document the whole profession can be proud
of."
Matthew McCoy, D.C.,
CCP vice president and project manager for the revision explained that,
prior to beginning the actual revision of the document, the CCP panel
conducted an intensive review of current literature relating to guideline
development and methodology. The panel was able to incorporate many of the
new concepts and procedures into the process.
Because, according to
Dr. McCoy, the CCP considers the guidelines process one of "continuing
evolution," the Council did not disband after the original document was
published. Instead, it performed ongoing reviews of new evidence and
literature in order to comply with the NGC recommendation to complete
updates and revisions every five years. The next scheduled review and
updating of the CCP Guidelines is scheduled for August 2008.
One of the first steps
in the update process, which began in early 2001, was a meeting of technique
developers and experts. Representatives of several technique systems that
were not involved in the development of the original document participated
in these early meetings and those previously involved were invited to submit
additional material. At the initial revision meeting, more than 40 named
technique systems were represented and a technique panel was formed that now
has about 125 members representing the widest possible range of techniques.
"The involvement of
technique experts is crucial to the development of any chiropractic
guideline," stated McCoy. "Unfortunately these dedicated and unsung heroes
have effectively been shut out of other groups' guideline development
efforts and the research community. Instead, they need to be deeply involved
in this process since the art of chiropractic is the application of the
philosophy and science."
Of major concern to
McCoy and the CCP were reports of state boards and regulatory agencies
attacking D.C.s based on the technique they use. Without evidence‑based
research and guideline recommendations to rely upon, regulatory officials
often demonstrate bias based on their own personal opinions of various
techniques.
"Some of these people
just seem to wake up one morning and decide for themselves that this or that
technique should be banned," McCoy complained. "The scary thing is that most
times there is more research and evidence supporting the technique they are
attacking than the gross, non‑specific manipulative procedures they are
advocating."
Other areas where
chiropractors are increasingly under scrutiny include wellness practices,
corrective care procedures, extended care plans and related practices, McCoy
noted. "According to the CCP Guideline, the need for high frequency initial
and extended wellness care plans should be based on a combination of basic
science, technique, objective assessment of physiological function,
structural changes and quality of life issues," he stated. "Practitioners
should rely on one or more of these elements to develop their care plan."
Veronica Gutierrez,
D.C., a member of the CCP Board of Directors and the only chiropractor to
serve on the White House Special Commission on Complementary and Alternative
Medicine, emphasized that practice procedures must be based upon "patient
understanding and acceptance of mutual health care and quality of life
goals."
Because vertebral
subluxation and these related concepts are central to the practice of
chiropractic and the profession, guidelines that specifically address them
are clearly needed, Kent noted.
For more information on
the CCP Guidelines, or to download a copy of the revised document at no
cost, visit the CCP website.