July 2004
ACA denied motion for Trigon rehearing
The American
Chiropractic Association (ACA) announced its intention to continue pursuing
its so‑far unsuccessful lawsuit against Trigon Blue Cross Blue Shield, even
though the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit rejected the
organization's petition to rehear the case.
The case, which was
originally filed in August 2000, has ‑‑ together with the ACA's lawsuit
against the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ‑‑ cost the
chiropractic profession an estimated $5‑7 million.
The lawsuit accused
Trigon and Blue Cross & Blue Shield of America of eight counts of
racketeering, extortion, mail fraud and antitrust violations and other state
and federal law violations.
The lawsuit fizzled
when the ACA voluntarily dismissed Blue Cross as a defendant and the court
dismissed two of the counts in July 2001.
On April 25, 2003, the
other counts were dropped when U.S. Federal Judge James P. Jones ruled in a
summary judgment that there were "no genuine issues of material fact
remaining for trial." The opinion explained that summary judgment is a tool
designed for "weeding out claims and defenses that have no factual basis."
The ACA filed an appeal
despite recommendations from other segments of the chiropractic profession
that the money being pumped into the litigation could best be spent on
legislation, public relations, research or other positive activities. The
ACA lost the appeal and was denied a request for a rehearing.
Still, the ACA refuses
to let go of the campaign, which it has touted as its primary service to the
profession.
Now, according to ACA
Chairman of the Board George McClelland, DC, the group intends to try to
take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court. The ACA and other plaintiffs have
90 days to file a writ of certiorari, asking the Supreme Court to hear the
case. Less than one percent of cases decided by federal appeals courts are
heard by the Supreme Court.
The ACA also is
continuing to solicit funds for its National Chiropractic Legal Action Fund,
which received thousands of donations from chiropractors and chiropractic
organizations after promoting the litigation as a "save our subluxation"
campaign. Although initially in favor of the stated goals of the legal
action, many doctors were disillusioned by the results and by the ACA's
failure to give reciprocal support to efforts by other organizations.
In 2003, the
Chiropractic Coalition ‑‑ made up of the World Chiropractic Alliance, the
International Chiropractors Association and the Federation of Straight
Chiropractors and Organizations ‑‑ issued a position paper cautioning that,
"a lawsuit is an extremely time‑consuming and expensive tactic. The National
Chiropractic Legal Action Fund (NCLAF), formed to fund the ACA lawsuit, has
reportedly already cost the profession more than $5 million, according the
ACA reports ... It is the opinion of the Chiropractic Coalition that this
money could be better spent on funding subluxation‑based research,
conducting public relations, engaging in national and international
legislative efforts, and other much needed programs to protect and promote
the chiropractic profession. Therefore, the Chiropractic Coalition can no
longer encourage doctors to provide additional contributions to the NCLAF."
The ACA has not
released any details about the amount already spent on the lawsuits or the
projected cost for filing and/or arguing the case before the Supreme Court.