July 2004
Let's talk success
by Dr. Madeline Behrendt
In May, I went to the
WCA 2004 Summit in Washington,
D.C., which energized and excited me. WOW!
It was spine‑tingling to be with so many principled chiropractors.
Congratulations to the organizers, speakers, and participants, including the
Chiropractic Coalition. I know the success of this synergy will move
chiropractic forward.
With success on my
mind, let's talk about chiropractic and success, and please, send me your
thoughts.
When I started
chiropractic school, success was defined by size ‑‑ specifically how big
your practice was. A BIG problem for me, as I didn't see it that way. No
hate mail please, I'm not criticizing high‑volume practices or those who
promote this model. Read on...
Prior to chiropractic,
I was an executive at one of the top companies in the world where I learned
that success is more than just volume. I ask you, does defining chiropractic
success as "500 visits per week" say that anyone is getting better? ... more
people are being introduced to chiropractic every day? ... the chiropractor
is prosperous? ... research documenting clinical results is making news? No,
no, no, and no. While a high‑volume practice is an accomplishment, what
about all those other things we care about?
As I progressed through
school, volume gave way to another size‑oriented model of defining success.
This approach embraced size the way sports cars and cell phones do. It was
about how small you can get while revving performance. Chiropractic related
this model of sleekness to office hours as in, what's the smallest schedule
you could work? I didn't see it that way. This was a small problem for me.
I've known top
businesspeople and while it's true they play hard, they love to produce and
so spend most of their time working! There's a lot to do in chiropractic.
Does defining chiropractic success as "working just 12 hours a week," say
that anyone is getting better? ... more people are being introduced to
chiropractic daily? ... the chiropractor is prosperous? ... research
documenting clinical results is making news? No, no, no ‑‑ and NO.
Finally, once I was out
of school, the "it's all about me" model made its debut. We've all
interacted with doctors from this perspective ‑‑ they can be hard on others,
hard on themselves.
I needed a success
model reflecting my life experiences and chiropractic goals, so: P+PA=S. I
love practice (P), and I love adding professional activities (PA) to my
life, and this defines success (S) to me.
My professional
activity is that I am a collaborator. I build through creating projects
where chiropractors who are also collaborators can express their talents.
Many people share the success, such as the JVSR fertility research project.
I feel blessed to work with the WCA. If you love subluxation‑based
chiropractic and are an achiever, this is a tremendous environment for
success.
Can chiropractic
function like a successful business, or better, like an un‑subluxated
nervous system with fully coordinated subsystems such as research,
advertising/PR, education, publishing, and politics? Chiropractic needs
prosperity in all these areas. At this level, success isn't about money but
a choice you make about achievement.
Yet, chiropractic's
subsystems have not received fuller participation because of money ‑‑
professional activities are usually self‑funded. This is beneficial because
these positions then fill with professionals still connected to the public
at heartbeat level: practitioners. But this is also a challenge.
Practitioners need to be financially and emotionally prepared. I know that
DCs think big. I listened to you at the WCA Summit. The questions now
involve balancing "P" and "PA" and where to make a big impact.
Transitions can be
vulnerable times ‑‑ student to practitioner, or practitioner to practitioner
plus professional activities. Let's engage in an open dialogue about:
professional activities and income, spousal support, the negative
chiropractor down the street who does nothing, traveling, how to increase
personal capacity, and setting boundaries. Let's have real conversations
with leadership, coaches, and peers who are sharing this path. Let's connect
with support.
One year could include
participating in a research project. Perhaps you hired an associate so you
can contribute politically or at the national level. Maybe your involvement
is concentrated for the two months before the Summit. Or, life moves and you
have new boundaries ‑‑ time off for a baby, a break‑up, or to relocate your
practice. This all works.
I found my success
model and the results speak for themselves. P+PA=S can demonstrate that
people are getting better through chiropractic care, that chiropractors are
prosperous, that more people are being introduced to chiropractic each day,
and research documenting clinical results is making news.
Success. Find YOUR
model.
I look forward to
seeing all you achievers at Summit 2005.
(Dr. Madeline Behrendt
is chair of the WCA Council on Women's Health and associate editor of the
Journal of Vertebral Subluxation Research [JVSR]. An author and speaker, she
is committed to connecting women to chiropractic and chiropractors to women,
and may be contacted at drmadeline@drmadelinedc.com)
*******