April
2005Way down yonder in New Orleans
by Gary Horwin, President, Federation of Straight Chiropractors and
Organizations
On N
ov.
11‑14, 2004, the Congress Of Chiropractic State Associations held its annual
business meeting in
New Orleans.
The mission of COCSA is to "provide an apolitical forum for the promotion
and the advancement of the chiropractic profession through service to member
state associations." There were representatives from almost every state
association at the meeting.
The
agenda included half‑hour time slots for representatives of national
associations to update the states on national issues. At the COCSA meeting a
few years ago, all four national associations were invited as
representatives. This year only ACA and
ICA
leaders were invited to speak. The
FSCO
and WCA were not. The "a" was removed from apolitical. I had been invited
to attend not as a representative of the FSCO, but as a state representative
for the Chiropractic Fellowship of Pennsylvania.
Attending the annual COCSA meetings over the past four years, I have watched
the organization become increasingly controlled by the ACA, as it has become
more prominent within the chiropractic profession.
This year, COCSA announced their Chiropractic Committee for Guidelines and
Practice Parameter is in the final phase of producing a document containing
Best Practices guidelines. This committee is the stepchild of the one that
previously produced the Mercy guidelines. The first chapter was to be
completed by the end of January 2005. The total document is supposed to be
completed by June 2005. I was told that even though the CCPGG is a committee
commissioned through COCSA the guidelines they produce will be distributed
to the profession and all interested parties without review or approval of
COCSA's state associations.
COCSA was given an opportunity to include a representative from the FSCO
onto the CCPGG committee. The Congress is divided into five districts. Each
district elects a representative to sit on the COCSA Board of Directors and
another to sit on the CCPGG committee. Six months prior to the New Orleans
meeting the representatives from the Northeast (district one) for both
committees resigned.
The states representing district one were asked for nominees for the open
seat on CCPGG. These are to be reviewed by the COCSA board of directors and
one would be appointed to sit on the committee until elections at the next
convention. The Fellowship selected from their membership Dave Smith (an
FSCO board member representing the Fellowship) for nomination.
I spoke with members of the COCSA board about appointing someone on the
CCPGG committee that is not an ACA member and could represent another point
of view. They agreed that Dave was an excellent candidate and met all the
criteria for being on the CCPGG committee. The only other candidate for the
committee was Tom Augit who is the current president of the ACA dominated
Northeast Chiropractic Council. Tom was of course selected and during the
ensuing meeting elected.
COCSA turns into ACA forum
Over the past four years the COCSA annual convention has increasingly become
a forum for the ACA agenda. This year it included support for the Trigon
lawsuit, CCPGG, Amicus brief, the upcoming
HHS
lawsuit, and a pitch for unity. Each of these ACA issues was presented
during the meeting. There was no mention of the Coalition (ICA FSCO and WCA)
efforts or agenda on any of these national issues. We were told how even
though the Trigon lawsuit was lost it was still a success for the
chiropractic profession. The insurance industry now knows we mean business.
They must be really afraid of us now that they know they can beat us.
The ACA went on to explain how even though they lost against all odds the
Amicus brief they were now going to sue the
HHS.
After wasting millions on a lawsuit that had no chance of winning, they will
continue on a new one that has even less of a chance. Then there is the
absorption (what is disguised as unity) issue. States should each be
represented by only one association for the good of our profession. Within
each state association there can be representatives from all factions within
chiropractic. However, with only one state association ultimately only one
opinion or view can be portrayed.
During my time as
FSCO
president, I have noticed a change in the national chiropractic arena. At
first, the four national associations (FSCO,
ICA, ACA, and WCA) met and tried to work together for the good of the
profession. We met numerous times through meetings set up by COCSA. We even
named ourselves the National Chiropractic Leadership Forum. These initial
meetings were successful and produced many agreements including the Saint
Louis Principals. The ACA then withdrew from these discussions and decided
to proceed with their own agenda. They have taken the stance that only the
ACA represents the chiropractic profession and what's good for the ACA is
good the entire profession. The other three national associations decided to
continue working together and the Coalition was born.
The ACA's agenda is clear. Chiropractic is for treating low back pain and
other symptoms. They continue to bring our profession closer to the medical
model. The current push is for the use of Homeopathic and medical drugs. We
must continue the fight to make sure there is a place within our profession
for the Vertebral Subluxation practitioner.