July 2005
Can insurance and cash coexist in a subluxation‑based wellness practice?
by Dr. Dennis Nikitow
I often get asked if
you can combine the use of both insurance billing and cash in a practice
without shifting the patient's focus on subluxation‑based wellness to just
back pain treatment. The answer is found in your positioning.
Let me go back about 20
years when I was teaching the "Cash Practice Seminar" to start the cash
practice trend. It was my humble beginnings in chiropractic that got me to
realize you could build a large healthy practice by conveying the principles
of chiropractic in a specific way ‑‑ so patients would value it and put
chiropractic on their health care team for their entire family.
It had nothing to do
with cash vs. insurance but with the focus patients had. Patients who
understood chiropractic principles had higher value for chiropractic for
overall health and wellness. They understood that subluxations don't cause
symptoms, but interfere with the nervous systems control of busy functions
and therefore health potential. They understood their kids could be
subluxated without knowing it, and therefore got their kids under
chiropractic care to maintain their spines.
In contrast, insurance
practice patients focused on back pain related conditions. They would do
chiropractic care if insurance would pay. Otherwise, in order to achieve
their desired outcome of pain relief, they'd use whatever medical means
insurance would cover.
The patient's focus and
resultant practice identity was a result of the doctor's focus and identity.
Although most doctors
embrace the chiropractic principles and philosophy, some run a paradoxical
practice of pain relief because they need to satisfy the insurance
protocols, parameters, and guidelines in order for insurance to pay their
patient's bill. Therefore, they communicate in insurance language, identify
patient problems with insurance protocols, and structure what the patient
needs based on what insurance will pay.
Since our actions
follow our focus, insurance‑based doctors speak the same language to their
patients. In essence, their patient education becomes symptoms,
condition‑oriented because this is the language they use to speak to
insurance companies, i.e., that same message is carried over to the patient.
On the other hand, the
cash‑based doctor is communicating subluxation‑based principles to maximize
patient value, resulting in patients finding a way to do chiropractic for
their entire family regardless of insurance payment.
Since insurance
code‑based charges are higher ‑‑ but in line with what insurance will pay ‑‑
the insurance‑based doctor's focus becomes more concentrated on
understanding the maximum reimbursement for each specific code. As long as
everything is in line, the insurance pays and both sides are happy.
The problem is these
doctors are frustrated with the insurance game of code numbers, changes in
restrictions, increased paperwork and the time and focus needed to
substantiate payment and receive insurance reimbursement they are solely
dependent on for their income. The appeal of a cash practice, on the other
hand, includes less hassle with paperwork, prepayment of services by
patients who understand the principle of chiropractic and why we should be
on their health care team, families' adherence to maintenance and prevention
concepts, and the satisfaction of spinal correction to a consistent model.
Although fees for
service are lower, they are in line with what people could realistically pay
for themselves and their families. The trade off is higher volume, and
bringing wellness service to more people.
The question is, can
the two be blended to maximize profitability, yet maintain subluxation based
wellness philosophy? The key is in a few important strategies.
First, the focus and
communication doctors lead with must be "value driven" by conveying the
principles and philosophy of chiropractic so patients understand that they
put a DC on their health care team to maximize nerve integrity for optimum
health potential. Once patients place a high value on chiropractic and
commit to care, the administrative side of the practice can move easily.
They must understand that the spine has a normal model, and that they'll be
on a corrective care program to restore their spine to that normal model.
Next, patients need to
be clear on the fact that all adjustments, exercises and rehabilitation are
to change nerve muscle memory so the spinal model can be restored and
evidenced on, before, and after x‑rays. Adjustments are not to merely
correct symptoms.
You can incorporate a
rehabilitation center in your practice to help accomplish this. This could
include exercise equipment for strength, stretching and proprioceptive
training. If these fall within the boundaries of restoring the spine to its
normal model, it aligns with the chiropractic philosophy of correcting the
VSC for maximum nerve integrity and optimum health potential.
Put together cash
packages for rehab under "bill insurance under PT or rehab," since it will
be more reimbursable than under chiropractic.
By having retail fees
and prepay cash fees, you can have options for the patient to maximize
affordable correction. If you bill insurance, then charge retail fee but
have discounts for rehab packages if prepaid cash. Use in‑clinic rehab for a
short period of time as an intensive phase to get the patient moving in the
right direction, and continue home rehab throughout the entire corrective
program and maintenance program.
Recommend only what's
needed to help restore the spinal model and do not base rehab
recommendations on insurance coverage.
Don't include therapies
at rehab. Therapies are symptom treatments and are within the boundaries of
pain practices not subluxation‑based wellness practices.
If the doctor remains
focused on correcting subluxations and restoring the spinal model then I
feel both insurance and cash can be integrated nicely. The key is the
patient's understanding of chiropractic, commitment to spinal correction for
optimum wellness, and putting a DC on his or her health care team.
If patients commit to
using chiropractic care it will be because they value it, not because of
insurance payments. Insurance then becomes a feature to use or not use as
partial reimbursement for adjustment services or rehab. Most important,
patients will continue their care for maximum spinal correction and be
excited about the outcomes.
The result will be a
healthy practice with families, higher volume, larger profitability, with
less administrative hassles.
(To learn about the
Certainty System, Certainty Practice Products and Dr. Dennis Nikitow's
upcoming seminar schedule, call 800‑544‑3884. Outside the U.S.,
303‑721‑6202.)