January 2006
RCS simplifies data collection process
>>> Power of the
Internet tapped for collaborative research
For many people, the
Internet is a confusing and sometimes frustrating jumble of tech, game and
porn sites, interspersed with blogs and interrupted by pop‑up and drop‑down
ads. Yet, for health care researchers, the power of the Internet has meant a
revolution in the way data is collected, accessed and disseminated.
In a recent issue of
the Journal of Medical Internet Research, Monica Murero, PhD, of the International Institute
of Infonomics in The Netherlands, stated: "The introduction and
popularization of the Internet is changing the way health‑care providers and
the general public search for and retrieve medical information."
It's also changing the
way researchers compile and analyze health care data, since it acts as a
global network of data collection points. Researchers in one part of the
world can input data in their own offices and have that information added
immediately to the pool of data streaming in from all other parts.
As noted in the Journal
of the American Medical Association, "Researchers who collaborate on
clinical research studies from diffuse locations need a convenient,
inexpensive, secure way to record and manage data. The Internet, with its
World Wide Web, provides a vast network that enables researchers with
diverse types of computers and operating systems anywhere in the world to
log data through a common interface." ("Use of a secure Internet Web site
for collaborative medical research" by WW Marshall, JAMA Oct. 11, 2000)
For the first time in
history, researchers are able to conduct large‑scale analyses of patient
population data acquired and pooled across sites around the world. That's
what The Biomedical Informatics Research Network (BIRN), is doing in the
neurology field. BIRN constructs and maintains an information infrastructure
‑‑ also known as "cyberinfrastructure" ‑‑ that allows researchers thousands
of miles apart to collaborate.
"By bringing together a
large team of researchers and marshaling information technology resources,
we expect to help clinicians diagnose and treat Alzheimer's disease and
other disorders more quickly than the current approach allows, where smaller
laboratory groups work mostly on their own," said Dr. Mark H. Ellisman,
director of the BIRN Coordinating Center (CC), which resides at the
University of California, San Diego School of Medicine in La Jolla.
RCS (Research &
Clinical Science) is conducting a similar project for the chiropractic
profession. Its cyberinfrastructure allows field doctors to become
collaborating researchers, uploading data from patients and research
volunteers into the global database maintained by the company in a Network
Operations Center in southern California.
There are other
similarities between the two programs as well. BIRN boasts that researchers
can access the program "from a user‑friendly interface on their desktop," an
advance that makes participation in research accessible to far more people.
The same is true with RCS, which allows doctors to use their existing office
computers to quickly and easily upload all research data. In addition, with
RCS, the web‑based technology even assigns unique ID numbers for each
volunteer and generates a fully individualized Vitality Wellness Index
report for each volunteer, which is emailed directly to the doctor.
There are, of course, a
few very significant differences in the two programs.
Most noticeably, BIRN
receives huge grants from the National Institutes of Health ($32.8 million
last year alone) while RCS is funded by private supporters as well as
membership fees from participating doctors. Yet, the biggest differentiation
between the two is that RCS deals solely with researching the impact of
vertebral subluxation on health and the vital role chiropractors have to
play in the wellbeing of all people.
So far, RCS has been
successful in generating a great deal of interest among doctors of
chiropractic, who are motivated to join RCS for different reasons. All
recognize the need for the scientific research necessary to provide
evidence‑based care to patients. Some also realize that being an IRB‑approved
clinical investigator is an ideal way to boost their professional
credibility. Others anticipate that their interactions with hundreds of
volunteers will allow them the opportunity to help many more people discover
chiropractic. They'll be contributing vital research as their practices
grow.
But, no matter what
motivates them to explore RCS, they share the desire for a simple‑to‑use
system that doesn't require additional equipment or take up a great deal of
staff time. That desire is what spurred RCS to offer a streamlined version
of its data collection process, using the power of the Internet to link
doctors to the RCS database.
Now, research is as
easy as connecting to the RCS website, where doctors simply input their
findings for each volunteer who has already filled out the web‑based
Self‑Reported Quality of Life study on his or her home or office computer.
All the data is correlated by the RCS computer network, ready to be analyzed
by the RCS International Scientific Advisory Panel.
Like the BIRN project,
the RCS project allows member researchers to participate using a
"user‑friendly interface on their desktop." But although the process is
streamlined, the quality of the research is never compromised. To make sure
the highest caliber of research is maintained, every doctor of chiropractic
who engages in the research must undergoes an evaluation by an independent
Institutional Review Board and is IRB approved. Furthermore, all RCS
Authorized Clinical Investigators must complete a two‑day training program
in California. Upon successful completion of the program, doctors receive a
Fellowship in Health Outcomes Research certificate.
RCS is clearly using
the power of the Internet to the fullest, bringing to life its vision of a
network of thousands of DCs around the world compiling standardized data on
millions of people including both individuals who do and do not use
chiropractic. With that information, we will finally have the "proof" to
quantify the devastating impact of vertebral subluxations on health, and
position ourselves as an essential part of everyone's wellness program.
(Dr. David A. Jackson
is chief executive officer of Research and Clinical Science ‑‑ RCS ‑‑ a
private sector research program exploring issues of subluxation correction
and chiropractic care as they relate to health and wellness. Previously, he
served as president of the Chiropractic Leadership Alliance and Creating
Wellness Alliance and was owner/operator of several private practice offices
in California and Idaho that specialized in high‑volume, family
wellness‑based care. For more information on RCS, call 800‑909‑1354 or
480‑303‑1694, or visit the RCS website at www.rcsprogram.com. Doctors of
chiropractic may log on to a special limited‑access area of the site by
using the username DC1 and password RESEARCH.)