April 2008
California takes action against PacifiCare
Multi-million dollar penalties possible for wrongful denial of claims
The California
Department of Insurance (CDI) and the California Department of Managed
Health Care (DMHC) have taken joint action against PacifiCare companies,
owned by UnitedHealth Group, in response to more than 130,000 alleged claims
handling violations.
This joint endeavor is
an historic step in the efforts of both agencies to put an end to the
practice of unfair claims handling in the health insurance industry,
announced Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner and DMHC Director Cindy Ehnes.
The collaborative effort is the first action ever by both agencies against a
single health plan or insurer.
In 2007, after
receiving hundreds of consumer and provider complaints about claims payment
problems by PacifiCare, particularly after it was acquired by United
Healthcare in late 2005, CDI and DMHC launched a joint investigation into
PacifiCare's alleged unfair practices.
California law
specifies that CDI generally regulates PPO (provider-preferred organization)
health products and DMHC regulates HMO (health-maintenance organization)
products.
"When they're injured
or ill, consumers rely on their insurers to pay legitimate claims," said
Poizner. "This promise is essential to our health care system, so after
years of broken promises to Californians, it is crystal clear that
PacifiCare simply cannot or will not fix the meltdown in its claims paying
process. We're going to put an end to that. If PacifiCare can't carry out
the ABCs of basic claims payment, today's regulatory action will help spell
it out."
Added Ehnes: "The most
fundamental purpose of insurance is the promise to pay claims fairly and on
time and PacifiCare has broken this promise. We're taking strong action
today to make sure patients and providers are treated fairly so that they
are able to continue to take care of California's health care needs."
PacifiCare's alleged
violations cited by CDI and DMHC include:
*** Wrongful denials of
covered claims
*** Incorrect payment
of claims
*** Lost documents
including certificates of creditable coverage and medical records
*** Failure to timely
acknowledge receipt of claims
*** Multiple requests
for documentation that was previously provided
*** Failure to address
all issues and respond timely to member appeals and provider disputes
*** Failure to manage
provider network contracts and resolve provider disputes
CDI also directed a
self-audit of PacifiCare's unfair pre-existing condition denials, resulting
in $765,157 in claims and recoveries for consumers and providers. As a
result of this CDI investigation, more than $1 million has already been
recovered for California consumers and health providers who were impacted by
PacifiCare's alleged violations.
CDI market conduct
examinations revealed that PacifiCare allegedly made large scale and willful
decisions to use broken systems to process claims and respond to providers,
while continually and effectively collecting premiums. CDI discovered
PacifiCare's alleged unlawful conduct last year while investigating consumer
complaints and then confirmed PacifiCare's failure to fix its systems during
a targeted market conduct examination which revealed the full extent of
alleged misconduct. CDI's investigation exposed PacifiCare's alleged
decision to improperly handle claims, which resulted in thousands of
infractions and grossly unfair treatment of policyholders and providers.
CDI's market conduct
examinations reviewed PacifiCare files processed between July 1, 2005 and
May 31, 2007, and have identified 130,000 violations of law by PacifiCare in
its claims handling practices and handling of provider data including
tracking of provider disputes and maintaining network lists.
Statutory penalties are
provided for up to $5,000 for each non-willful violation of law and up to
$10,000 for each willful violation of law. The enforcement action Poizner
has brought against PacifiCare thus potentially implicates up to $650
million if all violations are proven and shown to be non-willful and up to
$1.3 billion if all violations are proven and shown to be willful. The
company has admitted that it expects to lose at least 400,000 customers
nationally due to poor customer service.
Similar provider claims
payment violations have been established by the DMHC and the plan has been
assessed a penalty of $3.5 million, the largest fine imposed by the DMHC.
The DMHC fine differs from the CDI amount because it is calculated based on
a set of standards set by law, not on a per violation formula. In addition,
the DMHC has set out certain steps the company must take to correct the
claims payment problems, including an independent monitor to oversee changes
and additional staff to handle the workload.