March 2008
WCA opposes Kentucky's PT proposal
The World Chiropractic
Alliance (WCA) joined other organizations and individuals in urging the
Kentucky Board of Chiropractic Examiners not to vote in favor of a provision
that would require all doctors of chiropractic to obtain training in
physiotherapy.
In a letter to the
Kentucky board, WCA President Terry A. Rondberg, DC, stated:
"On behalf of its
members in Kentucky, as well as their colleagues around the world, I am
writing to express the World Chiropractic Alliance's strong opposition to
the regulatory proposal that would force all doctors of chiropractic to
obtain training in physiotherapy.
Physiotherapy is one of
many ancillary practices which chiropractors may incorporate into their
practices, but it is not an integral part of chiropractic and is not taught
in all accredited chiropractic colleges. In fact, the use of physiotherapy
is prohibited in some jurisdictions and, where it is permitted, its use is
discretionary, not mandatory.
By mandating training
in an 'elective' discipline, Kentucky
will, in effect, bar from practice any graduate of a chiropractic colleges
that has, as its mission, to train practitioners to contribute to an
individual's overall wellbeing by focusing on the correction of vertebral
subluxation. Those doctors will be forced to seek training in a
non‑chiropractic approach which is incongruent with their practice purpose.
Since physiotherapy is
directed toward symptom relief and the treatment of specific medical
conditions, it is contrary to the widely‑held chiropractic principle of
subluxation correction. Mandating training in that approach, then, becomes a
means to discriminate against that segment of the profession who choose to
practice traditional, subluxation‑centered chiropractic.
Further, a growing body
of scientific literature reports that passive physical modalities are of
little or no value in addressing musculoskeletal pain, and may actually
prolong disability. Evidence for this conclusion was provided in the
Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain, produced by
the Royal College of General Practitioners in Great Britain and The AHCPR
Guideline for Acute Low Back Problems in Adults. The proposal gives an
implied endorsement of the procedures by the Kentucky Board, which
contradicts this evidence and would therefore not be in the best interests
of the profession or the patients it serves.
The World Chiropractic
Alliance does not oppose the use of physiotherapy by doctors of
chiropractic, if they choose to obtain adequate training in that approach.
Nor does it oppose the use of other drug‑free and non‑invasive ancillary
health care approaches often adopted by chiropractors, such as massage
therapy, acupuncture and acupressure, nutritional counseling, ultrasound,
electrotherapy, etc., so long as these adjuncts are permitted by state law.
But it does oppose the mandating of any of these modalities.
I am familiar enough
with the Kentucky Board to know that its members have the best interest of
the profession and the public at heart. For that reason, I hope you will
re‑consider the wide‑ranging and potentially negative ramifications of such
a regulatory change and decide to continue with the policy of allowing, but
not forcing, its doctors of chiropractic to train in the non‑chiropractic
field of physiotherapy."