April 2009
Extension traction and patient safety
by Mark Payne, DC
So far, I've discussed
a couple of extension traction methods for restoring the cervical lordosis.
This is probably a good time to cover patient safety as regards extension
traction procedures.
CAUTION:
Extension traction procedures aren't for everyone.
There I said it. Of
course, I've been saying it constantly for the past 20 years or so.
Nevertheless, I continually speak with doctors who have never screened a
single patient before starting extension traction treatment. If you're
serious about correcting spinal curves, you need to understand the potential
risks associated with extension traction procedures and make sure your
patients aren't exposed to unnecessary risk of injury.
Essentially, every
therapeutic procedure involves some attendant risk and extension traction is
no different. It's our duty to weigh potential risks against potential
benefits. It's important we do everything in our power to detect potentially
"high risk" patients before they undergo any procedure that might
carry with it an unacceptable level of danger.
I strongly believe we
can minimize risks associated with extension traction procedures with
simple, common sense screening procedures. However, no screening procedure
is likely to be 100% effective. It's still possible that some high risk
patients may slip through our safety net. I understand this whenever I
consider using extension traction or any other type of therapy. You need to
understand it, too. It's our duty to act according to the current state of
knowledge, but unfortunately, extension traction is still a relatively new
procedure. The following information is the best I can offer you at this
time. It's up to you as the practitioner to determine whether these methods
are appropriate for any particular patient.
As a general rule of
thumb, you should not consider applying extension traction to any patient
for whom spinal adjustment/ manipulation would be contraindicated. By
definition, extension traction procedures involve extension (backward
bending) of the head and neck. Much has been written in the chiropractic
literature about the possible dangers associated with spinal
adjustment/manipulation involving extension of the head and neck combined
with cervical rotation. Although extension traction DOES NOT involve any
rotation of the neck, it is still prudent to screen for any individuals who
might be considered as "high risk" for physical treatment of the cervical
spine.

Dr. Gordon Stephenson (Columbus, GA) screens
patient for possible contraindications.
During the case
history, you ask about any conditions which might contribute to increased
risk of complications during extension traction and/or cervical spine
manipulation. Such conditions might include: family history or
predisposition to stroke, history of high blood pressure, hypertension,
diabetes, atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis, posterior osteophytic spurring,
disc protrusion/prolapse, smoking, oral contraceptives, prolonged use of
corticosteroids, Down's Syndrome, or spinal stenosis. This list isn't
necessarily all inclusive; however, extreme caution is recommended if any of
the above are present.
Contraindications
Factors which
contraindicate use of extension traction include, but aren't necessarily
limited to, patient history of:
*** Stroke or
cerebrovascular disease;
*** "Drop attacks,"
blackouts, loss of consciousness, disturbances of vision and/or equilibrium
associated with head positioning;
*** Transient ischemic
attacks;
*** Spinal fracture or
instability, spinal malignancy, infection or disease of the cord or column
including advanced osteoporosis; and
*** Hemophilia or
other blood clotting disorders including anticoagulant therapy.
All the above should be
considered ABSOLUTE contraindications to any attempts at extension traction.
In the case of lumbar extension traction, I believe that pregnancy and/or
the presence of aortic aneurysm also present unacceptable risk factors.
Assuming none of the
above are present, the patient is put through a simple five-step screening
procedure that includes the entire George's Test procedure (bilateral BP,
radial pulse, carotid artery auscultation, and vertebrobasilar maneuver) as
well as a trial period of extension traction. If significant
pain/discomfort, or more notably any neurological symptom, is elicited at
any point during the screening, the doctor should discontinue all further
attempts at extension traction until the cause can be determined.

Patient rests with head free hanging in full extension to determine
tolerance prior to application of any traction force.
A free copy of the entire screening protocol is available upon request.
I encourage all doctors
interested in extension traction procedures to request the free report
mentioned below. Extension traction has been widely used for well over two
decades with a remarkable record of safety. Let's keep it that way by
thoroughly screening every patient prior to starting any program of
extension traction. The responsibility to "do no harm" rests with each of
us.
(A 1979 graduate of
Life Chiropractic College, Dr. Mark Payne is the president of Matlin Mfg., a
manufacturer and distributor of postural rehabilitation products since 1988.
For more information regarding issues, products or methods discussed in this
column, or to receive the FREE
20-page report, "Patient Safety: Screening Procedures and Suggested
Treatment Protocols for Extension Traction,"
call 334-448-1210. Visit
www.matlinmfg.com for a free product catalog.)